EU's 2035 Fossil Fuel Sales Ban: Carmakers' Pleas for Delay Raise Questions of Green Hypocrisy?

The European Union set a goal to stop selling new cars that run on gas and diesel by 2035. It sounded pretty set in stone. But now, car companies are asking for more time, and it's making people wonder if they're really serious about going green or just saying the right things. This whole situation brings up questions about whether their actions match their words, especially when it comes to the EU 2035 fossil fuel sales ban delays. Carmakers' pleas are being heard, but it might just expose some green hypocrisy.

Key Takeaways

• Carmakers are asking the EU to push back the 2035 deadline for banning new fossil fuel car sales, which raises doubts about their commitment to environmental goals.

• The EU's 2035 ban is a major step towards cleaner transportation, but industry pushback suggests significant challenges or reluctance in meeting this target.

• Allegations of 'green hypocrisy' arise when companies publicly support climate action but then seek to delay regulations that impact their business models.

• Transitioning to electric vehicles faces hurdles like charging infrastructure, battery production, and making EVs affordable for everyone.

• The debate highlights a broader tension between ambitious climate policies and the economic realities faced by both manufacturers and consumers.

Carmakers' Shifting Stance on the EU 2035 Fossil Fuel Sales Ban

The Evolving Position of Automakers

It feels like just yesterday that major car manufacturers were falling over themselves to announce their commitment to an all-electric future. Promises of phasing out gasoline and diesel engines by 2035 were common, often accompanied by slick marketing campaigns about sustainability and innovation. This rapid pivot from internal combustion engines (ICE) to electric vehicles (EVs) seemed like a done deal. Now, though, as the 2035 deadline approaches, some of those same companies are starting to sound a little less certain. It's like they're looking for an exit ramp.

Industry Pleas for Extended Timelines

Suddenly, we're hearing a lot more about the challenges. Automakers are lobbying for delays, citing concerns about charging infrastructure, battery supply chains, and, of course, consumer demand. They point to the fact that not everyone can afford an EV right now, and that the charging network isn't quite ready for a full switchover. It's a bit of a head-scratcher, given how loudly they were championing the EV cause before. They're asking for more time, suggesting that maybe a complete ban by 2035 is just too ambitious. This is especially true when you look at the EU's reconsideration of its 2035 ban.

Questions of Credibility and Commitment

This change in tune raises some eyebrows, doesn't it? If the industry was so confident about EVs, why the sudden urgency to push back the deadline? It makes you wonder about the sincerity of their initial commitments. Were they genuinely leading the charge towards a greener future, or were they just following the regulatory trends and public pressure? It's hard not to question whether their primary driver is environmental responsibility or simply profit margins. The pushback suggests a potential disconnect between their public image and their actual business strategies.

The speed at which the automotive industry has shifted its public narrative on electrification is notable. While initial pronouncements emphasized a swift transition, current appeals for extended timelines highlight the complex economic and practical realities that were perhaps downplayed in earlier statements.

The EU's Ambitious Climate Goals and Their Impact

The 2035 Fossil Fuel Sales Ban Explained

The European Union has set some pretty big targets for cutting down on emissions, and the 2035 ban on selling new cars that run on gasoline or diesel is a major part of that. The idea is simple: by a certain date, you won't be able to buy a brand-new car with an internal combustion engine in the EU. This is meant to push everyone towards electric vehicles (EVs) and other zero-emission options. It's a bold move, no doubt about it, aiming to drastically reduce the carbon footprint of the transportation sector, which is a huge contributor to greenhouse gases. This policy is a cornerstone of the EU's broader strategy to achieve climate neutrality by 2050.

Driving Towards a Greener Transportation Future

So, what does this mean for how we get around? Well, it's a big push towards electric cars, hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, and maybe even some other innovative solutions we haven't thought of yet. The EU is hoping this will spur massive investment in EV technology, battery production, and charging infrastructure. It's not just about the cars themselves, but the whole ecosystem that supports them. Think charging stations popping up everywhere, from city centers to remote highways, and cleaner electricity grids to power all those EVs. It’s a vision of a future where your daily commute doesn’t add to air pollution or climate change. Some are even looking at how materials used in car production could count towards emissions targets, potentially allowing for amendments to the 2035 ban.

Economic Implications for the Automotive Sector

This shift isn't without its economic ripples, though. For car manufacturers, it means a massive overhaul of their production lines and business models. They've got to invest billions in developing and building EVs, and that's a huge undertaking. Then there's the supply chain – sourcing batteries and the raw materials for them is a whole new ballgame. For consumers, it could mean higher upfront costs for EVs, at least initially, though proponents argue that running costs will be lower. It's a complex transition that affects jobs, investment, and the very nature of the auto industry as we know it. The pressure is on for companies to adapt quickly, or risk being left behind in this rapidly changing landscape.

The push for greener transportation is a global trend, but the EU's 2035 ban is one of the most aggressive timelines. It forces a rapid transformation, which brings both opportunities and significant challenges for industries and consumers alike. The success of such a policy hinges on more than just setting a date; it requires a coordinated effort across technology, infrastructure, and economic support systems.

Unpacking the 'Green Hypocrisy' Allegations

Examining Carmakers' Public Statements

It's a bit of a head-scratcher, isn't it? On one hand, you have car manufacturers loudly proclaiming their commitment to a greener future, talking up electric vehicles and sustainability. They've been pretty vocal about supporting climate goals, at least in their press releases and at industry events. But then, when the rubber meets the road, so to speak, with concrete deadlines like the EU's 2035 ban on new fossil fuel car sales, suddenly there's a chorus of pleas for more time. It makes you wonder if the grand pronouncements were more about PR than genuine, immediate action. We've seen this pattern before, where the industry talks a good game about environmental responsibility, but then pushes back when those commitments require significant, immediate investment or changes to their business models.

Analyzing the Gap Between Promises and Actions

When you look at what car companies say versus what they actually do, a gap often appears. They might invest in EV research and development, but simultaneously continue to heavily promote and profit from their gasoline-powered lineups. It's like saying you want to eat healthier while still stocking your pantry with junk food. The EU's 2035 target is a clear marker, and the industry's pushback raises questions about their true readiness and willingness to transition away from their traditional revenue streams. It's not just about building a few electric models; it's about a fundamental shift in how they operate and make money. This push for delays suggests that the profit margins on internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles are still too attractive to abandon quickly, even with the looming climate regulations. It's a tough balancing act, for sure, but one that highlights potential hypocrisy.

The Role of Consumer Demand and Profitability

Let's be honest, carmakers are businesses, and their primary goal is to make a profit. They'll point to consumer demand and the current infrastructure as reasons for needing more time. They argue that if consumers aren't ready to buy EVs in large numbers, or if charging stations aren't widespread, forcing a ban is unrealistic. And sure, there's some truth to that. But it also feels a bit like a self-fulfilling prophecy. If the industry doesn't aggressively push EVs, invest in making them more appealing and affordable, and advocate for charging infrastructure, then consumer demand might indeed lag. It's a complex interplay, but the push for delays, especially when coupled with continued strong sales of gas cars, makes it seem like profitability is still king, even if it means slowing down the green transition. It's a bit like the situation where some groups oppose projects that are actually needed for green energy development, creating a confusing picture of environmental priorities Environmental Hypocrisy Continues: Eco-Left Bashes Projects That “Green Energy” Requires.

The industry's public stance often emphasizes a commitment to sustainability, yet their actions, particularly when faced with strict regulatory deadlines, reveal a strong attachment to existing profitable models. This creates a perception that environmental goals are secondary to financial interests when significant operational changes are required.

Challenges in the Transition to Electric Vehicles

Infrastructure and Charging Network Concerns

So, we're all supposed to be driving electric cars soon, right? That sounds great on paper, but have you thought about where you're going to charge them? It's not like you can just pull into any gas station and fill up. The charging infrastructure just isn't there yet, not really. We're talking about a massive build-out, and it's slow going. Imagine needing to drive across the country – you'd have to plan your whole trip around charging stations, and hope they're actually working when you get there. It's a big hurdle, and frankly, a bit of a headache.

Battery Technology and Supply Chain Issues

Then there are the batteries themselves. They're the heart of these EVs, and making them isn't exactly simple. We're talking about needing a lot of specific materials, and where do those come from? Often, it's from places with questionable environmental practices or unstable political situations. Plus, the technology is still changing. What's cutting-edge today might be outdated in a few years, and then what do you do with those old batteries? Recycling them is another whole can of worms.

Affordability and Consumer Adoption Hurdles

Let's be real, electric cars are still pretty expensive. Even with government incentives, the upfront cost can be a major barrier for a lot of people. And it's not just the car; you might need to install a special charger at home, which adds more cost. People are also worried about how far these cars can go on a single charge, especially in colder weather, and what happens if the battery dies on a long trip. These practical concerns are making a lot of folks hesitate before making the switch. It’s a lot to consider when you’re just trying to get from point A to point B.

The push for electric vehicles often overlooks the practical realities faced by everyday drivers. While the environmental benefits are touted, the current limitations in charging availability, the high cost of entry, and concerns about battery longevity and performance create significant friction for widespread adoption. Without addressing these core issues, the transition risks leaving many consumers behind.

Global Perspectives on Fossil Fuel Phase-Outs

Comparing EU Policies with Other Regions

The European Union's 2035 ban on new fossil fuel car sales is a bold move, but it's not happening in a vacuum. Other parts of the world are also wrestling with how to transition away from gasoline and diesel. Some places are pushing ahead aggressively, while others are taking a more cautious approach, or even going in the opposite direction.

It's interesting to see how different countries and regions are handling this. For instance, California has its own ambitious targets, aiming to ban the sale of new gasoline cars by the same year, 2035. This has a big ripple effect, as many other US states tend to follow California's lead on environmental regulations. On the flip side, some countries are doubling down on fossil fuels, perhaps due to economic pressures or different energy priorities. We've seen reports of regions looking to increase oil and gas production, or facing challenges with renewable energy reliability that force them back to traditional sources.

Here's a quick look at how things stack up:

• European Union: Aiming for a 2035 ban on new fossil fuel vehicle sales.

• California (USA): Also targeting a 2035 ban on new gasoline car sales, influencing other US states.

• Other US States: Some are adopting similar targets, while others are actively pushing back against EV mandates.

• Global Energy Companies: Some are shifting investments back towards oil and gas, despite broader climate goals.

The global picture is a patchwork of policies. While the EU and some US states are setting firm deadlines for phasing out combustion engines, economic realities and energy security concerns mean that fossil fuels remain a significant part of the energy mix in many other areas. This divergence creates a complex landscape for automakers and consumers alike.

The Influence of National Climate Strategies

Every nation has its own climate strategy, and these plans heavily influence how they approach vehicle emissions. Some countries have integrated aggressive targets for electric vehicle adoption directly into their national climate action plans, often tied to international commitments like the Paris Agreement. These strategies usually involve a mix of regulations, incentives for EV buyers, and investments in charging infrastructure. Other nations, however, might prioritize energy independence or economic growth from their existing fossil fuel industries, leading to less stringent targets or even policies that support continued fossil fuel use. The effectiveness of these national strategies often depends on political will, public support, and the economic capacity to invest in a green transition.

International Cooperation and Divergence

When it comes to phasing out fossil fuels, especially in transportation, there's a clear split in global approaches. The EU is pushing hard with its ban, but not everyone is on the same page. Some countries are enthusiastic partners, aligning their own goals and policies to match or even exceed the EU's ambition. They might collaborate on research, share best practices, or work together on supply chains for batteries and charging technology. However, there's also significant divergence. Other nations, perhaps facing different economic pressures or having different energy resources, are not moving as quickly. Some might even be actively supporting their domestic fossil fuel industries. This lack of universal agreement means that global automakers have to navigate a complex web of regulations, making it harder to standardize production and sales strategies worldwide. This patchwork of international policies highlights the challenges of achieving a truly global transition away from fossil fuels.

The Economic Realities of Green Transportation

Impact on Food Costs and Consumer Spending

So, we're all supposed to be excited about this big shift to electric cars and other "green" transport, right? But let's talk about what that actually means for our wallets. It's not just about buying a new car; it's a whole chain reaction. When energy costs go up because we're pushing for renewables and phasing out older tech, that cost doesn't just stop at the gas pump (or the charging station, for that matter). It trickles down. Think about the food you buy. Getting that food from the farm to your table involves trucks, ships, and planes, all of which use fuel. If fuel prices climb, so do the costs of getting food to the grocery store. This means your grocery bill gets bigger, even if you're not driving an electric car yourself. It's a hidden tax, in a way, that hits everyone, especially those already struggling to make ends meet.

The Cost of Transition for Manufacturers

Automakers are in a tough spot. They're being told to ditch gasoline engines by a certain date, but developing all-new electric vehicle platforms and retooling factories costs a fortune. It's not like they can just flip a switch. They have to invest billions in new battery tech, electric motor production, and software. Plus, they've still got all those existing factories and workers tied to making traditional cars. What do they do with all that? It's a massive financial gamble. They're trying to balance what the government wants with what consumers can actually afford and what makes business sense. It's a real tightrope walk, and a misstep could mean job losses or even company collapse.

Balancing Environmental Goals with Economic Stability

Look, nobody wants a polluted planet. But we also need to be realistic about how we get there. Pushing too hard, too fast on green transportation without considering the economic fallout can cause more problems than it solves. We've seen how quickly food prices can jump, and that's just one example. There's a delicate balance to strike between wanting a cleaner future and making sure people can afford to live their lives today. It's about finding solutions that work for the environment and for everyday people, not just for the people making the policies or the companies selling the new tech. We need practical steps, not just grand pronouncements.

The push for widespread adoption of electric vehicles and other green transportation methods brings significant economic questions. While the environmental benefits are often highlighted, the associated costs for consumers, manufacturers, and the broader economy are substantial and require careful consideration. Ignoring these economic realities can lead to unintended consequences, such as increased living expenses and industry disruption, potentially undermining the very goals the transition aims to achieve.

Political Pressures and Policy Adjustments

Lobbying Efforts by the Automotive Industry

The car industry, a massive economic force, isn't just sitting back and waiting for regulations to take effect. They're actively engaging with policymakers, trying to shape the rules around the 2035 ban. It's a complex dance, with manufacturers arguing for more time to transition their production lines and develop new technologies. They point to the huge investments already made in current platforms and the need for a smoother, less disruptive shift. This lobbying is a standard part of how big industries influence environmental policy.

Government Responses to Industry Concerns

Governments, especially in the EU, are in a tough spot. They've set ambitious climate targets, but they also have to consider the economic impact on a major sector like automotive manufacturing. We're seeing a back-and-forth, with some officials pushing back against industry demands, emphasizing the urgency of climate action. Others, however, seem more open to discussions about flexibility, perhaps acknowledging the real-world challenges automakers face. It's a balancing act, trying to meet climate goals without causing widespread job losses or economic instability.

The Debate Over Mandates and Incentives

There's a lot of talk about whether mandates, like the 2035 ban, are the best way forward, or if incentives for electric vehicle (EV) production and adoption would be more effective. Some argue that mandates provide the clear signal needed for investment, while others believe that a carrot-and-stick approach, with strong incentives for green tech and perhaps less stringent penalties for slower adoption, could achieve similar results with less economic shock. It's a debate that touches on everything from consumer choice to the speed of technological innovation. For instance, Swedish carmakers like Volvo and Polestar are urging the EU to maintain its 2035 ban, believing that Chinese manufacturers will continue their EV progress regardless, and the target should be upheld. You can read more about this stance on maintaining the established deadline.

The push for greener transportation is a global conversation, but the specific policies and the speed at which they are implemented vary significantly. Different regions grapple with unique economic conditions, resource availability, and political will, leading to a patchwork of approaches rather than a unified global strategy.

Examining the 'Hypocrisy' in Climate Action

It's easy to talk a big game about saving the planet, but when the rubber meets the road, things can get a little… complicated. We're seeing a lot of talk about ambitious climate goals, especially from politicians and industry leaders. But then you look at what's actually happening, and sometimes it feels like there's a big gap between the words and the actions. It makes you wonder if everyone's really on the same page.

Politicians' Actions Versus Their Words

Politicians often make strong statements about environmental protection and climate action. They might champion new green initiatives or criticize policies they deem harmful to the environment. However, critics point out instances where these same individuals or their parties might support projects or policies that seem to contradict their stated environmental values. For example, some might advocate for renewable energy while also approving new fossil fuel infrastructure. It's a tricky balance, and the public is watching.

The Disconnect in Environmental Messaging

We've seen this play out in various ways. On one hand, there's a push for electric vehicles and phasing out gas-powered cars. On the other hand, the infrastructure needed to support a full EV transition – like widespread charging stations – is still catching up. This creates a situation where the message is clear, but the practical support isn't quite there yet. It's like telling someone to run a marathon but not giving them enough water along the way. This disconnect can lead to frustration and skepticism about the sincerity of climate commitments.

Holding Leaders Accountable for Climate Pledges

So, what does this all mean? It means we need to look beyond the headlines and the soundbites. We need to examine the actual policies being enacted and the investments being made. Are the actions taken truly aligned with the stated goals? When governments or industries set targets, like the EU's 2035 ban, it's important to see if they are also putting in the work to make those targets achievable. This includes looking at things like:

• Support for research and development in green technologies.

• Investment in renewable energy sources and grid modernization.

• Policies that genuinely encourage consumer adoption of sustainable options.

It's about ensuring that the push for a greener future isn't just a talking point, but a tangible reality. We've seen accusations of hypocrisy before, like when Senate Democrats questioned the cost of rebranding the Department of War, suggesting a focus on appearances over substance. Similarly, Republicans have accused Democrats of hypocrisy regarding government shutdown strategies, highlighting perceived inconsistencies in their political stances. These examples show how easily perceived contradictions can undermine public trust in climate action.

The Future of Internal Combustion Engines

So, what happens to the good old gas guzzlers after 2035? It's a question on a lot of people's minds, especially with the EU's big push towards electric vehicles. While the focus is shifting, it's not like every single internal combustion engine (ICE) car will vanish overnight. The reality is more complex, with several factors influencing their continued, albeit diminishing, presence.

Technological Advancements in Fossil Fuel Vehicles

Even as the industry pivots, there's still work being done to make existing engine technology cleaner and more efficient. Think about improved fuel injection systems, better exhaust after-treatment, and lighter materials. These aren't revolutionary changes, but they do chip away at emissions and fuel consumption. It’s about squeezing the last bit of efficiency out of a technology that’s been around for over a century. Some manufacturers are still investing in these incremental improvements, trying to meet stricter emissions standards even as the clock ticks down.

The Viability of Synthetic Fuels

Synthetic fuels, often called e-fuels, are a hot topic. These are fuels made using renewable energy sources, like hydrogen produced from electrolysis powered by wind or solar, and captured carbon dioxide. The idea is that burning these fuels would be carbon-neutral because the CO2 released was originally captured from the atmosphere. This could, in theory, allow existing ICE vehicles to continue running without adding net carbon to the air. However, there are big hurdles.

• Production Costs: E-fuels are currently very expensive to produce compared to traditional gasoline or diesel.

• Scalability: Producing enough synthetic fuel to power a significant portion of the global vehicle fleet is a massive undertaking.

• Energy Efficiency: The process of creating e-fuels is energy-intensive, meaning a lot of renewable energy is needed.

Despite these challenges, some automakers and governments are looking at e-fuels as a way to keep classic cars on the road or to decarbonize sectors where electrification is difficult. It's a potential lifeline, but not a silver bullet for the entire ICE fleet. The European automotive sector, for instance, has been lobbying the EU on these very points, hoping for a more flexible approach [aaf4].

The Long-Term Outlook for Traditional Engines

Looking ahead, the writing is on the wall for new ICE vehicle sales in many regions. The 2035 ban in the EU is a significant marker, and other places are following suit or considering similar timelines. This means that while we'll still see ICE cars on the road for years to come – especially in countries with different regulations or where used car markets are strong – the development of entirely new ICE platforms will likely slow down considerably. The focus will increasingly be on maintaining and servicing existing vehicles, and perhaps on niche applications where alternatives are not yet practical. Some EU countries, like six nations urging the European Commission, are pushing for a more gradual phase-out that might include hybrids [6313].

The transition away from fossil fuel vehicles is a massive undertaking, touching everything from manufacturing plants to the fuel we put in our cars. While electric vehicles are the headline act, the future of internal combustion engines is a story of adaptation, potential workarounds like synthetic fuels, and a gradual, but definite, decline in new production.

Consumer Sentiment and the EV Market

Public Perception of Electric Vehicles

When you talk to people on the street, you hear a lot of different things about electric cars. Some folks are really excited about the technology and the idea of helping the environment. They see EVs as the future, no doubt about it. But then you have others who are pretty skeptical. They worry about how far these cars can go on a single charge, where they're going to plug them in, and, honestly, how much they cost. It's a mixed bag out there, for sure.

Factors Influencing Purchase Decisions

So, what makes someone actually decide to buy an electric car? It's not just one thing. Price is a big one, obviously. A lot of people still think EVs are just too expensive compared to gas cars. We're talking about a significant chunk of consumers, around 60%, who feel that way. Then there's the whole charging situation. Is there a charger nearby? How long does it take? These are real questions people have. And let's not forget about the actual driving range. Nobody wants to get stuck somewhere because their battery died. It's a whole list of practical concerns that weigh on people's minds.

Here's a quick look at some common hesitations:

• Initial Cost: EVs often have a higher sticker price.

• Charging Infrastructure: Availability and speed of charging stations.

• Range Anxiety: Fear of running out of power before reaching a destination or charger.

• Battery Life & Replacement: Concerns about battery degradation and future replacement costs.

The Role of Marketing and Information

Car companies and governments have been pushing EVs pretty hard, talking up all the benefits. They show us sleek ads and talk about saving money on gas and being good for the planet. But sometimes, the information out there can be a bit confusing or even misleading. You hear about government incentives, but then you find out many EVs don't even qualify for them. It makes you wonder what's really going on behind the scenes. Getting clear, honest information is key for people to make up their own minds.

The push for electric vehicles involves a lot of different players, from car manufacturers to government agencies. While the goal is often framed around environmental benefits, the reality for consumers involves a complex mix of cost, convenience, and available technology. Understanding these factors is important for anyone considering the switch.

It's a bit like when rental car companies started pushing EVs onto customers; it felt like a move driven more by policy than by genuine customer demand. People want choices, and they want to know they're getting a good deal without a lot of hidden headaches. The whole EV transition is still pretty new for a lot of us, and we're all just trying to figure it out as we go.

So, What's the Real Story Here?

It’s a bit of a head-scratcher, isn't it? Carmakers, the very companies that have profited for decades from selling us gas-guzzlers, are now asking for more time to ditch them. They talk a big game about going green, but then they push back when the deadline gets serious. It makes you wonder if the push for electric cars is more about following the rules than a genuine commitment to the planet. We've seen this kind of thing before, with politicians and leaders saying one thing and doing another. It's hard not to see a pattern of folks wanting the good PR of being 'green' without actually doing the hard work. We'll have to wait and see if they actually make the switch by 2035, or if more excuses pop up.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the EU's 2035 ban on fossil fuel cars?

The European Union has made a plan to stop selling new cars that run on gasoline or diesel starting in the year 2035. This means that after this date, only new cars that produce zero emissions, like electric cars, will be allowed to be sold in EU countries.

Why are car companies asking to delay the ban?

Some car manufacturers are saying they need more time before they can completely stop making gas and diesel cars. They claim it's hard to switch everything over quickly and they want to make sure they can still make enough cars that people can afford.

What does 'green hypocrisy' mean in this situation?

The idea of 'green hypocrisy' comes up because some people think car companies are saying they care about the environment but then asking for delays on rules that would help the planet. It's like saying one thing but doing another, especially when it might affect their profits.

Are there problems with electric cars that make the switch difficult?

Yes, there are challenges. Building enough charging stations for electric cars is a big one. Also, making enough batteries and making sure the materials for them are available are tough jobs. Plus, electric cars can still be pretty expensive for many people.

Are other places in the world doing similar things to the EU?

Many countries are looking at ways to reduce pollution from cars. Some places have their own goals for when to stop selling gas cars, and others are focusing on encouraging electric vehicles. It's a global effort, but different places are moving at different speeds.

How does switching to electric cars affect everyday costs?

Switching to electric cars is part of a bigger plan to change how we get around. While the goal is cleaner air, there are worries about how these changes might affect things like food prices and how much money people have to spend on other needs. It's a balancing act.

What are synthetic fuels, and could they be a solution?

Synthetic fuels, sometimes called e-fuels, are made using electricity and captured carbon. Some people think these could be a way to keep using existing car engines without polluting as much. However, they are often expensive to make and not yet widely available.

Do people actually want to buy electric cars?

More and more people are interested in electric cars, but it really depends on the price, how easy it is to charge them, and how far they can go on a single charge. Marketing and how much information people have also play a big part in whether they choose an electric vehicle.